To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
The animations look really good, it feels quite natural to me.
Hi,
It would be great if the top-bar where the favorites are would change. Imo the left- and right-button just don’t cut it as the user does not know how often they have to press right/left to reach what they want. A scrollbar is a lot faster in accessing.
So are these animations taking advantage of the new nifties in Qt 4.6? I mean, I have a live USB of the netbook preview of Kubuntu Karmic around here somewhere, and the animations on my netbook are *FAR* from as smooth. It has a “Newspaper” activity with some basic newspaper/comic/microblogging widgets set up by default, and scrolling that page is really not a pleasant experience.
For what it’s worth, the machine is a MSI Wind U100 rebrand, so the graphics chipset is an Intel 945GME. The intel driver and mesa stack in use was from the xorg-edgers ppa, so really fresh-from-trunk.
Is it just Qt 4.6 being that much better?
This launcher looks so cool. Would be cool if it becomes available as a plasmoid so that Desktop Activity users could use it as well.
The graphic chipset of an EeePc 1005Ha is an intel gma 500, aka poulsbo, no?
For being acceptable, it would have the same performance on an intel 945 or 950 used in most of netbooks.
@Lionel Chauvin: nope, it has a GMA950. and at the moment there aren’t good Linux drivers for the GMA500, so you would get something much slower that that
@Emil Sedgh: uuh, hmm, perhaps some day 😀
@JR: yes Qt 4.6 is quite faster
I’m starting to like this netbook shell more and more, the animations look really nice. Thanks for your work on this
Hi
Thanks for the demo. I tested the latest Kubuntu package out on my 13″ notebook and it works quite well. Would be interesting to try this out on an N900 😀 ?
For those interested, you can switch between the two by killing plasma-desktop and Alt+F2 running plasma-netbook (and on Kubuntu installing the plasma-netbook package, obviously)
Thanks!